<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Locally Hosted Email Responders: Why They Should Be Considered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://garyknox.co.uk/locally-hosted-email-responders-why-they-should-be-considered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://garyknox.co.uk/locally-hosted-email-responders-why-they-should-be-considered/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Jones</title>
		<link>http://garyknox.co.uk/locally-hosted-email-responders-why-they-should-be-considered/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyknox.co.uk/blog/?p=632#comment-475</guid>
		<description>I tried both Omnistar Mailer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.omnistarmailer.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.omnistarmailer.com&lt;/a&gt; and Interspire and found Omnistar Mailer to be a lot better.  It has more features in terms of autoresponders because you are able to control the target list for autoresponders better and it is priced better.  I agree that hosting your own email marketing is better because you do not have the monthly fees. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried both Omnistar Mailer <a href="http://www.omnistarmailer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.omnistarmailer.com</a> and Interspire and found Omnistar Mailer to be a lot better.  It has more features in terms of autoresponders because you are able to control the target list for autoresponders better and it is priced better.  I agree that hosting your own email marketing is better because you do not have the monthly fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locally Hosted Email Responders: Why They Should Be Considered &#124; bingo bango</title>
		<link>http://garyknox.co.uk/locally-hosted-email-responders-why-they-should-be-considered/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Locally Hosted Email Responders: Why They Should Be Considered &#124; bingo bango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://garyknox.co.uk/blog/?p=632#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Locally Hosted Email Responders: Why They Should Be Considered   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the original post here: Locally Hosted Email Responders: Why They Should Be Considered   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

